NOTICE DATE:  November 13, 2008      

NOTICE TYPE:  M-D111308-01 Legal   

SHORT DESCRIPTION:  Protocol Interpretation Request on Reactive Power Capability Requirements

INTENDED AUDIENCE:  All ERCOT Market Participants

LONG DESCRIPTION:  An Entity has submitted to ERCOT a Protocol Clarification/Interpretation Request (PIR) regarding subsection (2) in Protocol Section 6.5.7.1, Generation Resources Required to Provide VSS Installed Reactive Capability, and subsection (5) in Protocol Section 6.7.6, Deployment of Voltage Support Service.  Specifically, the PIR seeks clarification on issues surrounding Reactive Power capability requirements.

 

ERCOT provides the following guidance to the questions submitted by the Entity.

  1. Clarify if the power factor capability of +/- 0.95 is required at all levels of generation.

 

Yes.  Protocol Section 6.5.7.1(2) sets the Reactive Power capability requirement for all Generation Resources that provide Voltage Support Service (VSS).  The section states that a Generation Resource is required to have and maintain an Unit Reactive Limit (URL) with a power factor capability of +/- 0.95, determined at its net max output to the transmission system, and that this capability must be maintained – no exceptions are provided. 

  1. Clarify the minimum reactive capability requirements at lower levels of generation and exactly how this is calculated.

 

There is no minimum Reactive Power capability requirement.  The Reactive Power requirement is set forth in Protocol Section 6.5.7.1, Generation Resources Required to Provide VSS Installed Reactive Capability.  Specifically, subsection (2) states:

Generation Resources required to provide VSS except as noted below in items (3) or (4), shall have and maintain a URL which has an over-excited (lagging) power factor capability of ninety-five hundredths (0.95) or less and an under-excited (leading) power factor capability of ninety-five hundredths (0.95) or less, both determined at the generating unit’s maximum net power to be supplied to the transmission grid and at the transmission system Voltage Profile established by ERCOT, and both measured at the point of interconnection to the TDSP. 

As described in the response to Question 1, Protocol Section 6.5.7.1(2) states that a Generation Resource must provide the MVAR requirement (+/- 0.95 power factor) calculated at the maximum net output to the ERCOT Transmission Grid, and that level must be available at all MW output levels. 

ERCOT, or TSPs designated by ERCOT, have the right to instruct Generation Resources to make adjustments for voltage support within the URL capacity limits.  However, dispatching a Generation Resource within a URL range is the right of the system operator, and is unrelated to, and does not affect a Generation Resource’s obligation to maintain a power factor capability of +/- 0.95 when dispatched by ERCOT or TSPs.

Protocol Section 6.7.6(5) confirms the power factor capability requirement in Protocol Section 6.5.7.1(2).  Specifically, the first sentence reads:

At all times a Generation Resource unit required to provide VSS is On-Line, the URL must be available for utilization at the generating unit’s continuous rated active power output, and Reactive Power up to the unit’s operating capability must be available for utilization at lower active power output levels

Therefore, under this Protocol as well, the power factor capability requirement does not decrease with decreasing generation output.  A Generation Resource must be able to maintain the MVAR capability requirement as described in Protocol Section 6.5.7.1(2) even with decreasing power output. 

The second sentence in Protocol Section 6.7.6(5) states:

In no event shall the Reactive Power available be less than the required installed reactive capability multiplied by the ratio of the lower active power output to the generating unit’s continuous rated active power output, and any Reactive Power available for utilization must be fully deployed to support system voltage upon request by ERCOT, or a TSP.

This sentence does not conflict with the power factor capability requirement in the first sentence or Protocol Section 6.5.7.1(2) by establishing a minimum reactive capability requirement.  In fact, as described above, the requirement in 6.5.7.1(2) is confirmed in the first sentence of this section.  The language in the second sentence of this section merely accounts for situations in which a Generation Resource encounters equipment-related issues or other unforeseen circumstances that may cause the Reactive Power capability to be less than the requirement in Protocol Section 6.5.7.1(2).  If the Reactive Power is less than the calculation described in the second sentence, then the Generation Resource’s ability to support system voltage may jeopardize the reliability of the ERCOT Transmission Grid.

  1. Clarify the definitions for “generating unit’s maximum net power” as indicated in Protocol Section 6.5.7.1(2) and “the generating unit’s continuous rated active power output” as indicated in Protocol Section 6.7.6(5).

 

Both references above refer to the Net High Capability Limit provided by the Generation Resource to ERCOT through resource registration.  Net High Capability Limit is the net high MW generation output based on the rating of plant equipment minus plant Load.

CONTACT:  If you have any questions, please contact your ERCOT Account Manager. You may also call the general ERCOT Client Services phone number at (512) 248-3900 or contact ERCOT Client Services via e-mail at [log in to unmask].

If you are receiving e-mail from an ERCOT distribution list that you no longer wish to receive, please follow this link in order to unsubscribe from this list: http://lists.ercot.com.

sg