Here is the document associated with issue 91. Please review.
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.
I have attached the information collected by those assigned to work on Items 91, 100, and 10X of the TAC-owned Emergency Conditions List. The assignees were Marty & Ian, who are copied on this email.
Please review their notes, and send any questions or comments back to them for further consideration. If they do not get further questions or comments, then we can send this summary to the ROS, and request closure of the PDCWG work on these topics.
Chad – Ian Haley and I have composed responses to the Emergency Conditions List for our assigned items 91, 100 and 100x (120) in the attached document. Is there anything else you would like us to do with these items for PDCWG?
We would like to suggest more discussion regarding:
Item 91 - Could fast frequency response play a bigger role? This item does not ask the next question regarding what why batteries aren’t bidding FFR.
Some market participants have identified the following reasons to change the procurement of FFR (not related to this event):
We think these issues should be discussed at a policy working group such as WMWG.
To unsubscribe from the WMWG list, click the following link: