Content-Type:
multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_d3214940b5af4f56a165a44e6ac8807dPWEMCEXCH03cpssatxcom_"
Date:
Mon, 26 Apr 2021 02:08:59 +0000
MIME-Version:
1.0
|
Thank you Bob. We can work this in.
David Detelich
From: Bob Wittmeyer <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 1:32 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [InternetMail][MARKETING] BTM and ERCOT Terms for DG
(sorry if this is a duplicate email, last one seemed to gotten locked up by ERCOT Servers)
Attached is a slide I would like to present Just prior to Sham’s proposal.
It simply outlines, the BTM Term that Shams uses, back to defined terms in the ERCOT Protocols, as developed by the Resource Definition Task Force.
The slides represent the current state of Distributed Generation in ERCOT. Regardless of the policy direction WMWG members want to pursue, I believe this slide will help everyone understand the current state of “Behind the Meter” in ERCOT.
Bob Wittmeyer
512 762 8895
________________________________
To unsubscribe from the WMWG list, click the following link:
http://lists.ercot.com/scripts/wa-ERCOT.exe?SUBED1=WMWG&A=1
########################################################################
To unsubscribe from the WMWG list, click the following link:
http://lists.ercot.com/scripts/wa-ERCOT.exe?SUBED1=WMWG&A=1
|
|
|